Broadsword vs Bastard Sword

When delving into the rich history of medieval weaponry, two terms often emerge: broadsword and bastard sword. While these swords share some similarities, they also possess distinct characteristics that set them apart. This article aims to compare and contrast these two types of swords, drawing on historical context and practical usage to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Historical context and terminology

Broadsword

The term “broadsword” dates back to Middle English, over a thousand years ago. Historically, this term was not very specialized, often used generically to describe various types of swords. In the late 17th century, the term gained popularity to differentiate heavier cut-and-thrust swords from the lighter, thrust-only small swords that were becoming common at the time.

Broadswords are characterized by their broad, heavy blades designed primarily for cutting. They were used extensively in the British Isles and are often associated with the Scottish basket-hilt broadsword (claymore), a type of sword with a broad blade and a distinctive basket hilt for hand protection.

Bastard Sword

The term “bastard sword,” also known as a hand-and-a-half sword, refers to a type of sword that blends the characteristics of a one-handed arming sword and a two-handed longsword. The term “bastard” signifies its hybrid nature, as it does not fit neatly into the category of either a one-handed or a two-handed sword.

Historically, medieval people did not have many specialized terms for swords. They would often refer to them simply as “sword” or, if longer, as “long sword.” The bastard sword emerged as a more modern designation to describe a versatile sword that could be used with one or two hands.

Physical Characteristics

Broadsword

• Broad, heavy blade primarily designed for cutting. The blade can be either single-edged or double-edged.
• Typically, a broadsword has a blade length over 30 inches.
• Broadswords are relatively heavy, often ranging from 1 kilogram to 1.8 kilograms or more. The basket hilt helps balance the sword, making it more agile despite its weight.
• Often features a basket hilt for hand protection, especially in the Scottish variants.

Bastard Sword

• The blade length is shorter than that of a longsword but longer than an arming sword. The blade is versatile, capable of cutting and thrusting.
• Longer than that of a one-handed sword, providing enough space for an additional hand. The handle often tapers down and may feature a pear-shaped pommel.
• Balanced to facilitate both one-handed and two-handed use. It is generally lighter than a broadsword, making it more nimble.
• Can be used effectively with one hand or two, offering flexibility in combat situations.

Last words

As a sword enthusiast and collector, I find both the broadsword and the bastard sword to be fascinating additions to any collection, each with its own unique appeal.

Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the wielder. Understanding the historical context and physical characteristics of each can help in making an informed decision. Whether for historical reenactment, martial arts practice, or personal interest, both swords hold a significant place in the fascinating world of medieval weaponry.