Bastard sword vs Longsword (Battle of the Knights)

Bastard sword vs longsword is a comparison often made between two European weapons used by medieval warriors. Many people may misunderstand them due to their similar designs.

While they do share certain features, they also have key differences that set them apart.

These distinctions are what categorize them as either a bastard sword or a longsword. In this article, we’ll compare these weapons, exploring their advantages, disadvantages, and unique characteristics.

But first, let’s delve into their historical background to better understand their intended purpose in combat.

Historical Background

Both weapons have their roots in European history. They emerged during periods of intense military conflict. The longsword became widespread in the 13th century, recognized for its versatility in both offense and defense.

It was used primarily by knights and foot soldiers to strike powerful blows and its effectiveness in close combat.

The bastard sword (epee batarde) appeared later, around the 14th century, as a response to evolving combat techniques and armor. It bridged the gap between the longsword and arming one handed swords.

It’s development reflected the changing needs of warfare, as warriors sought a more versatile weapon that could be wielded with one or two hands and even used with a shield when needed.

Design and Characteristics

Historically, the bastard sword is often considered a shorter version of the longsword. The defining feature is its handle, which is long enough to allow a two-handed grip but short enough to be used effectively with one hand as well.

While most bastard swords are double-edged, there are historical examples of single-edged swords with hand-and-a-half grips. These are not typically referred to as bastard swords. The term “bastard” is generally associated with double-edged blades.

However, some later bastard sword replicas did develop more complex hilts, incorporating elements like finger rings to enhance hand protection.

Hilt

The hilt is the main feature that distinguishes them from each other. Longswords usually have a handle slightly longer than a typical two-handed grip, while bastards, despite being called “hand-and-a-half,” are designed for a full two-handed grip.

In the latter, the space from the crossguard to the pommel is completely filled by the hands, same as shown in the image.

Blade

In most cases, longswords feature a longer and narrower blade. This narrower design is important because it reduces the sword’s weight. On the other hand, the bastard sword’s length is slightly shorter, and the blade is broader sometimes, which helps delivering more powerful slashing.

Who win in a 1v1 duel?

When it comes to who wins a duel, many factors come into play. Knowing the right techniques, skill, and strategies matter more than the differences between the blades.

When we make such comparisons, we discuss the theory along with its pros and cons. The result always depends on the swordsman’s skill.

However, let’s explore some of the advantages and disadvantages they may have.

Holding a Bastard sword

Because the sword can be used with one hand, the other hand can hold a secondary weapon, such as a knife, shield, or buckler. The knife can be reserved for emergencies, like when the sword or shield is dropped.

However, the best option is often a buckler or shield. In this case, try to stay close to your opponent and block their attacks with the shield. After each block, you’ll have the opportunity to counterattack.

If you choose to use the sword without any additional equipment, you will be faster and more flexible, but your reach will not be as long as that of a longsword.

Holding a Longsword

Using a larger sword means more weight and slower movements. This is the main downside of using a longer sword.

As a longsword user, you’ll focus on slashing motions. You will also use the extended reach of the longer blade. You can thrust, or if you deflect the bastard’s blade during an attack you can deliver quick cuts.

Your opponent may try to stay closer than your ideal reach, and if they use a shield to protect their upper body, aim for their legs.

These are just some general strategies. Different scenarios, such as fighting on a battlefield, in tight spaces, from horseback, or against armored opponents, can completely alter the tactics and approaches you need to use.

However, if the question were: What sword is better than a longsword? the answer is simple—one of the swords that is probably better than a longsword is the hand-and-a-half epee batarde.

Choosing the Right Sword for Your Needs

When selecting a longsword replica or other medieval swords, start by defining your purpose: is it for display, reenactment, or cutting practice? If historical accuracy is essential, ensure the sword matches the specific period you’re interested in.

For practical use, consider the sword’s balance, weight, and handling. Ensure it is made with high carbon steel for sharpness and edge retention.

If you are looking for top recommendations, we have already done the research and compiled a list of some of the best medieval swords available, whether for collection or use.

Last words

Overall, both weapons hold significant places in medieval weaponry, each distinguished by unique features that suit various combat scenarios.

Both offer exceptional versatility and maneuverability. With their longer blades and balanced weight, they provide a powerful advantage in reach and striking power.

If you want to see how a bastard sword compares in handling against another medieval sword used by knights, check out our other article, Bastard Sword vs Greatsword. This will give you a clear idea of how these swords perform in combat and their unique handling characteristics.

Want to see more comparisons?

• Rapier vs Longsword